Category Archives: Internet Freedom

Digital inclusion and who controls the Internet

Does “Broadband For All” Apply to California’s Tenants? It Should.


By Tracy Rosenberg

In the wake of the COVID pandemic revealing the cracks in the digital divide, the State of California made a historic investment in Internet infrastructure with the construction of a middle mile connection to enable high-speed Internet delivery all over the State. The program that encompasses the statewide middle mile network and provides grants for service branching off that network is optimistically titled “Broadband For All”.

But is it really “broadband for all” if California’s tenants and the problems they have accessing Internet service is left out of the conversation?

Continue reading Does “Broadband For All” Apply to California’s Tenants? It Should.

Media Alliance Statement on 6th Circuit Decision to Repeal Nationwide Net Neutrality Rules

Media Alliance, along with the Benton Institute for Broadband and Society (https://www.benton.org/) were intervenors in the federal court case against the FCC’s latest attempt to establish nation-wide net neutrality for the Internet.  Today we found out that the Sixth Circuit used the recent Supreme Court decision in Loper that weakened the Chevron Doctrine, to overturn net neutrality rules. This is the second time in the last eight years that nation-wide net neutrality rules have been overturned.

Here in the state of California, we are lucky because Senator Scott Weiner introduced and Gov Gavin Newsom signed, California net neutrality laws that were already sustained in federal court in the Mozilla decision. We have net neutrality protections, but because of today’s terrible decision, most of the rest of the country will not.

This matters because an Internet that isn’t neutral allows providers to block, throttle and deprioritize online speech and content based on who pays more and who pays less creating “slow lanes” that can isolate small businesses, creative works or unpopular news and information. The entire value of the Internet to ordinary people is its openness and its ability to facilitate connections that otherwise would never happen. While we feel lucky to live in California, which did the right thing, it is deeply disappointing that the courts failed to protect the open Internet and that Congress has not made network neutrality the law of the land. We call on the rest of the states to follow the lead of California, Oregon, Washington and Vermont and immediately pass state-level net neutrality laws to protect the open Internet.

Tracy Rosenberg, Executive Director, Media Alliance

Net Neutrality

Net neutrality is the principle that the company that your Internet Service Provider does not get to control what you do on the Internet, and that an Internet user should be able to access all content and applications equally, without discrimination by the ISP.*  This applies to everyone, including emergency first responders, teachers and students, city administrators, doctors and patients, and small businesses and their customers.

When the federal government eliminated net neutrality protections, California passed its own net neutrality legislation. 

Continue reading Net Neutrality

Amici Filed in Defense of Open Technology Foundation

Media Alliance joined an amici (friend of the court brief) filed in the case of Open Technology Foundation vs David Pack (and the Trump Administration). Trump appointee Pack disbanded the entire board of OTF which creates and maintains encrypted software tools like Signal and Lets Encrypt, an open source website security protocol.

In an early win, the board was recently temporarily reinstated, overturning an earlier decision on appeal, but the lawsuit is still winding its way through the courts for a final determination.

Continue reading Amici Filed in Defense of Open Technology Foundation

Media Alliance comments on Section 230

Media Alliance filed these joint comments with Global Exchange on behalf of the Protest Facebook section in the FCC’s proceeding on Section 230 of the Telecom Act.

Section 230 exempts online platforms from liability for their content. It is one of the pillars of the Internet that has allowed alternative content to thrive on the Internet. And in an era of disinformation, we are seeing the dark side of freedom from liability.

Media Alliance categorically rejects that Section 230 should be abolished or ended. Just as categorically, we believe that tempered regulation of online platforms to address the viral spread of disinformation and online hatred is called for.

Here are the comments we submitted to the FCC.

Continue reading Media Alliance comments on Section 230

218 Groups Demand Affordable Broadband in Stimulus

218 groups, including industry, local governments, and human rights nonprofits, have written to Congress to insist that access to affordable broadband must be a part of upcoming stimulus packages.

The letter states:

Broadband enables people to work remotely, access medical care, and apply for governmental benefits. As all levels of education transition to online for the forseeable future, reliable Internet access is necessary for students to be successful. Like food, water and electricity, everyone needs broadband during this unprecedented crisis.

Continue reading 218 Groups Demand Affordable Broadband in Stimulus

252 Groups Ask FCC To Expand Lifeline

A massive coalition of justice and equity groups has asked the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to expand the Lifeline program to meet the challenges of the COVOD-19 epidemic.

The group made three demands.

  1. To immediately prohibit the disconnection of Lifeline (subsidized) connections
  2. To require Lifeline providers to unlimited voice and texting services within one week.
  3. To create an emergency Lifeline Broadband program within 21 days.

You can read the letter below.

Continue reading 252 Groups Ask FCC To Expand Lifeline

25 Groups Object to Graham-Blumenthal Anti-Encryption EARNIT Act

25 civil society groups, led by the Open Technology Institute at New America and including Media Alliance, sent a letter objecting to the EARNIT Act, which seeks to weaken encryption standards.

The letter states: “By setting the stage for adoption of best practices that, whether directly or indirectly, require companies to avoid offering strong device encryption or end-to-end encrypted messaging services, the bill could create encryption backdoors. Backdoors to encryption make everyone in society more vulnerable to privacy, cybersecurity, and other risks.”

Continue reading 25 Groups Object to Graham-Blumenthal Anti-Encryption EARNIT Act